The Sandman Overture 2

sandman 2Today, Shelby and Drew are discussing the The Sandman Overture 2, originally released March 26th, 2014.

Shelby: There are a few dreams I’ve had in my life that I remember very clearly. Once I dreamt I had to go to a new job, and in order to get there I had to swim underwater. On my first day, we’re swimming and swimming, and I’m running out of air but I have to stay behind my guide. Then I woke up gasping; I had been holding my breath in my sleep. Not too long ago, I dreamt I was in a dark room that was even darker near the door. I had to pass through the darkest part of the room to leave, and as I did, two hands shot out of the shadows and grabbed my arms. That was one that had me bolt upright in bed, and then turn on every light in my apartment. I think these dreams stuck with me because there was a sense of reality to them; I was actually holding my breath, I could almost feel the stranger’s hands on my arms. Dreams are like bits of reality spun together to resemble a sort of whole, a feeling that Neil Gaiman and J.H. Williams have somehow captured in their long-awaited second installment of Sandman Overture.

This issue is full of cryptic meetings. First, an all-white version of Dream meets with Mad Hattie, a homeless woman over 200 years old, in a dream. She shows him the ruins of the sanitarium she used to inhabit, and he takes with him a watch that doesn’t tell time in the way we think of it, thanking her for help long ago. Then, the various aspects of Dream meet and come to the conclusion that an aspect of themselves died, the universe may be dying as well, and they need to speak to the First Circle. Finally, Dream meets with Glory of the First Circle in his ruby. There, Glory tells him that a star has gone mad, and that madness is spreading. Like flies to honey, the madness is drawing creatures to feast upon it, and eventually the universe will no longer exist. Turns out, there was a dream vortex a long time ago that Dream was supposed to eliminate, and did not, and that is what caused this whole thing. So, Dream and his cat aspect (Cat Dream from here on out) head out to make things right.

There’s a lot to take in this issue, even more so if you aren’t super familiar with the original Sandman story. I’m going to stay away from lengthy explanations, however, and focus on the issue at hand. Gaiman is talking about the end of the universe, total entropy. Speaking of Entropy, I think this might be her.

the end of all thingsWilliams delivers page after page of beauty in this book, but this one really stuck out to me. The flat, heavy lines contrast with everything else in the book, and colorist Dave Stewart gives the whole scene a luscious, cool palette. I mean, just look at the way the stars on her skin sparkle off the page! Truly, truly breathtaking.

Back to the idea of entropy. Gaiman describes what is happening here as a madness which will spread until “the mind that is the universe will cease to think.” I can’t think of a better description for the process of order degrading to chaos than a cancer-like madness. The real question is why; why is Dream fighting this natural and irreversible process? It’s because he kicked the whole thing off, and now he’s got to fix it: not because it’s the right thing to do, but because Dream has always been pretty arrogant. He admitted to his self-centered behavior himself in his visually overwhelming (in a great way) meeting of selves.

dreamsI don’t think he’s looking to right any wrongs here, I think his pride just won’t let him be in the wrong. It could very well be an issue of semantics; whether its his sense of duty or sense of pride, as long as he’s stopping the end of all things what difference does it make? His motives already have me thinking about how this story ends. We know this quest will end with him weakened enough to be captured at the beginning of Sandman; will that prove to be the price he pays for his hubris, or an unjust punishment for a heroic deed?

Only two issues in, and I want to peel away the layers of this book until I find its undoubtedly gorgeously illustrated core. Drew, if I recall, you are not especially familiar with the original Sandman title; does this book suck you into its dream like it does me, or is it too confusing to sink in? What did you make of Hattie’s dream of the asylum?
Drew: The asylum certainly is weird, isn’t it? Or, maybe it’s weirder that Hattie would so desperately want to return to it that she would dream about living there after her life had fallen apart. Either way, the rooms of the asylum provide Williams with an excuse for some stunning in-panel dividers.

Dream AsylumAs for the imagery of a living building, it’s not entirely without precedent in The Sandman — Fiddler’s Green was a living location (or, is at least as alive as any other dreams), and I’ve never really shaken the idea of the living flesh walls of the house John Constantine’s ex-girlfriend was living in (you know, the one who had Dream’s sand pouch). I’m not yet entirely sure what to do with those connections, but they do rather effectively stitch this series into the fabric of the original run — no mean feat for a prequel made almost 15 years later.

As for your questions about familiarity — I’m not sure it really matters. So long as we understand who dream is and what he is capable of (which I think the first issue established quite well), there’s not a whole lot else here we need to keep up. So far as I can tell, all of the other characters (besides Lucien) are brand new, meaning old and new fans are largely in the same boat as far as knowing exactly what’s going on.

Even those details that directly fall out of having read the whole series — why there would be an all-white Dream in the “Now” portion of the story, versus the black-haired, black-cloaked Dream from the “1915” portion — are laid out clearly enough for the novice. Hattie herself remarks that there’s something different about Dream now — she accuses him of being Dream’s son or brother — which is really all novices need to understand what’s going on. I may not have seen exactly how the switch takes place (and don’t worry, I can hand in my nerd badge on the way out), but the change in appearance and lettering, as well as Hattie’s open comments about those changes, makes it clear that this isn’t the same Dream. Having read the first few trades, I can make some educated guesses about what happens (at least thematically), but it ultimately isn’t important to the proceedings here.

Then again, the talk of how time “goes in so many ways” may just have the characters interacting with the main series in a more direct way. I don’t mean to suggest a Back to the Future part II kind of rehash — I sincerely doubt that Gaiman would do anything like that — but it seems to me that Dream may have set up something in 1915 that would require attention today. That whatever that something is (a promise, a deal, a system of some kind) could have been effected by the events of The Sandman seems like a distinct possibility, which would give Gaiman a more natural way to bring back his favorite characters and ideas.

Not that he needs any help. This issue manages to twist, tweak, and amplify some of the main series’ favorite concepts — particularly that Dream has many forms in many places. In that way, The Sandman has always been in part about creating art, and perhaps specifically about how Gaiman creates art. It makes sense, then, that this story would feature both the old Dream, living in the past, palling around with all other manifestations of himself as well as a new Dream, who lives in the present, and whose own destiny isn’t tied to what will happen in The Sandman. It seems Gaiman is wrestling with the idea of returning to the Dream well himself, right on the page, which is above and beyond the high expectations I already have for this series.

It’s almost too good. Brilliant writing, gorgeous, innovative art work, clever meta-commentaries about storytelling. I’d accuse Gaiman and Williams of creating this just for my own personal pleasure, but I’m pretty sure everybody likes stuff this well-made.

For a complete list of what we’re reading, head on over to our Pull List page. Whenever possible, buy your comics from your local mom and pop comic bookstore. If you want to rock digital copies, head on over to Comixology and download issues there. There’s no need to pirate, right?

14 comments on “The Sandman Overture 2

  1. Shelby, I like this question of why Dream would be fighting against entropy, and I think it might come back to your intro paragraph. Basically, we like the idea that Dreams have meaning or are effective in some way — your underwater dream making you hold your breath in real life, or the hands-in-the-dark dream making you turn on the lights. Dreams, and by extension stories (as we talked about in issue 1), have meaning.

  2. Mad Hattie does a reference about “telly”. There was no TV in 1915, and the hospital looks like a modern ruin of an old hospital. The white Sandman is Daniel, isn’t he? The presence of Daniel and some of the dialogue between versions of Dream made me wonder if Lyta Hall is somehow involved.

        • I know I know — it’s a very well-known work and I do feel a little guilty for not having finished it, but I think, given the context, it’s okay to play on the safe side as far as spoilers go. In this case, I’d say it’s a bit more like trying to avoid spoiling a movie when discussing its sequel, but so long as it doesn’t hinder the conversation, what’s the harm? There have been a LOT of new comics readers over the past 10 years, and it’s entirely possible they haven’t read (or finished) Sandman. Shelby was extending a courtesy to those readers, and I think it was a thoughtful choice.

          That said, it may not ultimately be possible to discuss this issue (and likely this series) without acknowledging the end of Sandman, which is why I devoted so much of my portion of the piece to pointing out that Gaiman has already made this clear enough. That is, we don’t need to worry about spoiling anything because the comic actually does it for us. Like, you don’t actually need to have seen Empire Strikes Back to see Return of the Jedi — they establish the fallout of that twist ending pretty early on.

          At any rate, I don’t think it’s ever wrong to avoid spoilers. It may be too cautious from time to time, but better too cautious than to flippantly ruin someone’s reading experience, right?

        • Sure. I agree you did it okay. It’s just that I love that “is it still a spoiler” debate. Open a comics blog, get cranky foreign readers for free! 🙂

          But, more than that, I think Gaiman simply dropped the Daniel/Mad Hattie stuff assuming readers would get the reference. It was too overt to be a minor plot point. Maybe it was too obscure to be a major plot point also.

          If Lyta Hall is possibly involved, as I think she is from the bread crumbles I picked in the storyline, those appearances tell me where to reread for context.

          (I’ll probably have plenty of time to do it before number three is out… lol)

        • Hey, no worries — we all have our pet subjects/chips on our shoulders. I totally agree about the way Daniel is casually dropped in here as basically presuming our familiarity with the source material — I think it’s safe to assume as much when dealing with sequels/prequels.

          Still, I think it would be kind of a bummer if Lyta Hall played a significant role here. I think that would feel like a bit of a rehash, and would prevent the story here from really standing on its own. I’m not entirely sure what Daniel is up to, but it seems like it’s going to have to somehow relate directly to whatever Dream does in 1915.

  3. (But I’m guilty of playing with that kind of effect on the line to watch “Passion of Christ” more than 10 years ago. “Hey, I heard he dies in the end, but they’ll pull a gimmick and maybe get him back for the sequel!”)

  4. I have not read the original series which garners me a great deal disbelief and ire from folks since: A. I read a lot of comics and B. sell them in a store I run. This series got really good for me with this issue. The art was always good and while the writing was not bad in the ways comics often are in the first issue, it felt deliberately obtuse, which to me is lazy writer trick for “interesting.” I have not expectation of the series other then tell me a good story and no notion of what I think it should be about or where it should go.

    This would have been a better first issue. I think it sets things up and gets rolling all in one issue. We get a better sense of the character, the stakes involved, as well as the scope and setting. Also the art is amazing. The art felt so much better in this issue then it did in the previous one which was still top notch. It made me wonder what DC was thinking with cheesing him off Batwoman since he is an amazing talent. If this is the result then we the consumer may have gotten a good deal out of it all.

    It would have been nice if the editors could have ridden Gaiman more to have the first issue have the the elements of this one. I am guessing these days editors don’t have a lot of influence over Gaiman, folks are just thankful to get him.

What you got?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s