Wonder Woman 21

Today, Mark and Spencer are discussing Wonder Woman 21, originally released April 26th, 2017. As always, this article contains SPOILERS.

Mark: Wonder Woman 21 is a showcase for the whole of Wonder Woman — from her physical strength to her compassion for those in need — that continues Greg Rucka, Liam Sharp, and company’s holistic rehabilitation of the character. And after Diana has taken the backseat in the past few even-numbered issues, it feels appropriate to have her front-and-center as the narrative loop begins to close.

There are stand-out moments throughout Wonder Woman 21, from the look on Diana’s face after deflecting Maru’s sniper bullet to Sharp’s awesomely rendered reveal of Ares’ prison, but the highlight of the issue comes towards the end, as Diana extends her hand to Veronica Cale and offers assistance. Cale is a woman who has worked against Wonder Woman for years, hurting not just Diana, but her best friend as well. That, despite all of this, Wonder Woman is still willing to see Cale as an ally rather than an enemy perfectly encapsulates who Wonder Woman is.

And while we’ve seen many of these beats from Rucka and company in previous issues, what I used to consider wheel spinning I now more charitably view as Rucka laying down a statement of intent. “This is what a Wonder Woman comic looks like,” he promises, and such a template is necessary for the character’s long-term health. Wonder Woman has been generally rudderless for long enough that a template for, shall we say, less experienced writers to follow in their own iterations of the character in the future is a welcome development. It’s something Scott Snyder has been able to instill during his many years as the captain of Batman titles, but with Rucka’s run on Wonder Woman down to only a few remaining weeks, he has much less time to develop the same guidelines for whoever follows him.

It’s a gambit that I hope pays off. I’ve discussed in the past how Rucka has positioned Diana Prince as an avatar for womankind and used this run as an opportunity to explore the treatment of women in our systemically misogynistic culture, so I won’t repeat the argument here, but it’s important to note that Rucka never fetishises Wonder Woman as the ideal or perfect woman. Diana Prince is a literal god — a perfect, unachievable state of being. She’s not the model for what a woman should be but rather for what we should all strive to be; courageous, compassionate, strong, selfless, enduring in the face of crisis and hardship.

The distinction between paragon and avatar in Rucka’s interpretation of the character is vital because Rucka is, after all, not a woman, and can’t speak from any sort of direct experience. That doesn’t diminish the achievement of this Wonder Woman run, but it does highlight that we’re long overdue for a capital “F” Feminist Wonder Woman written by a woman.

But such a development seems destined to remain nothing more than a long-term dream, of course, given that feminism is considered commercially toxic to the large entertainment corporations to the point that almost everyone involved with Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale, of all things, goes out of their way to avoid invoking the f-word seemingly out of fear of alienating the “All Lives Matter” crowd. Factor in that DC has a history of pinballing between interpretations of their iconic female heroes — following up thoughtful entries with arcs willing to lean into the characters’ more pin-up qualities, before course correcting again — and the future of Wonder Woman feels as uncertain as always. But why focus on the cloudy future when the present gives us so much to enjoy?

What’d you think, Spencer?

Spencer: I gotta echo your fears about whoever succeeds Rucka, Mark, given DC’s track record with Wonder Woman creative turnovers, but I’m not ready to give those fears too much energy yet — analyzing the great stuff Rucka and his creative partners are actually doing right now is much more pressing, and far more interesting to me.

That said, I think you’re on the right track when you describe this run as a template for how Wonder Woman should be written. I don’t know whether that’s intentional on the creative team’s behalf — I’m sure they’re primarily concerned with creating compelling stories that stay true to Diana and her supporting cast, and “Rebirth’s” back-to-basics approach essentially calls for all these titles to be, in a sense, a template for the platonic idea of each character — but it certainly works out that way. In that sense, I think the most important thing this series has done — and which Wonder Woman 21 continues to do — is build up Diana’s supporting cast and villains.

There’s been some murmuring here and there about Diana being pushed out of her own book by her supporting cast; there’s some validity to those criticisms, but also some necessity to it. Supporting characters have been the biggest victims of Wonder Woman‘s yo-yo creative teams throughout her history — each new creative throws out what came before and starts over with their own supporting players — so I think it’s important that Rucka and Sharp not only decided to bring back Diana’s classic supporting cast, but to build them up into characters that can hold their own, who future creative teams will hopefully want to include in their runs.

At this point Veronica Cale is practically a co-protagonist, but Rucka and Sharp have lavished just as much attention on Barbara Minerva. She’s not just a bad guy, but a fallen hero, someone misled and possibly betrayed, a character with a past and history that makes her interactions with Diana so much richer. Her taunt to Diana in the first panel burns because we saw Barbara teach Diana English and how exciting it was for them both. And the callback to Barbara’s friendship (possibly more?) with Etta reinforces the supporting cast’s bonds, not just with Diana, but with each other as well — which, again, is essential to building them into characters that both readers and future creative teams will want to keep reading about.

Fortunately, Diana’s just as compelling in this issue. Mark already pointed out her strongest moment — reaching out to Veronica Cale with compassion — but I love the contrast Rucka and Sharp create between that moment and her fight with Poison at the story’s outset.

Diana doesn’t tolerate fools. She’ll always reach out to an opponent with an open hand first, but when pushed, she’ll shrug off bullet wounds and take out her enemies with ruthless efficiency. The frightening sight of Wonder Woman in battle makes her compassion all the more powerful — she doesn’t reach out to enemies because of opportunism, or because she has to, but because she genuinely cares about everyone. Rucka and Sharp strike a perfect balance with their Wonder Woman — she’s a peerless warrior, but does not lust for battle, and always pursues peace instead. Like I said: perfect.

Artist Liam Sharp can take much of the credit for Diana’s badassery — under his pen Wonder Woman is powerful and unflappable, her appearance as remarkable as her feats. I also adore Sharp’s panel and layout choices — the smaller panels with thick black borders (almost resembling frames of film) are incredibly versatile, their size not only allowing Sharp to cram quite a bit into a page (he’s channeling George Perez with the reaction shots to the dogs running into the tree) but to arrange them into almost any configuration he pleases. My favorite example comes early in the issue.

Here Sharp uses his layouts to emphasize Diana. Every time she shares a panel with another character she’s trapped within its borders, but as soon as she’s alone in a panel it loses its border altogether, as if it simply can’t contain her — even when she’s in the sights of a monstrous sniper. It all leads to that final panel, where she stands out as the page’s primary figure, again emphasizing Diana’s power, skill, and agency. This effect continues onto the next page.

Again, Diana continues to elude the constraints of the panel borders, but once she snatches up Poison she takes her with her — she doesn’t just lift her into the air, she pulls her right out of the panel and into the gutter! Thanks to the angle of the “camera,” in the second page’s second panel Diana then appears to be punching Poison back into the panels, and thus, the world she actually understands. That’s how disorienting it is to be attacked by Wonder Woman — or, at least, by Sharp and Rucka’s imposing take on her.

Mark already mentioned Sharp’s other bravura moment — the reveal of the “tree” and Ares’ prison within — but I’m still at a loss as to what the tree could possibly be. Ares is imprisoned in it, but the tree existed before Diana defeated Ares, first encountering her own Themyscara before she even left for Man’s World. Is Ares not a mastermind, but just another victim of whatever force has been manipulating Diana’s life? Or, perhaps more shockingly, are even the moments we’ve seen play out throughout Rucka’s run (such as Ares’ defeat) not entirely true? Should we be trusting anything we’ve seen?

It’s a testament to Rucka and Sharp’s skill that their run on Wonder Woman is so successful despite a story that’s never been all that clear. Their masterful character work more than makes up for it, and I can’t imagine that changing in the time they have left with this book.

For a complete list of what we’re reading, head on over to our Pull List page. Whenever possible, buy your comics from your local mom and pop comic bookstore. If you want to rock digital copies, head on over to Comixology and download issues there. There’s no need to pirate, right?

8 comments on “Wonder Woman 21

  1. I have little to add except that I don’t think Diana has been completely rudderless in recent memory. Her New 52 reincarnation was quite good and definitely a clear and unique vision of her. It deteriorated at the end (although I only read one or two issues after Azzarello), but that was a solid 3 years.

    I’m going to miss Rucka writing this. I think it’s been pretty exceptional comics.

    • I described Diana’s title as having “yo-yo” creative teams in the piece itself, and I stand by that. In recent memory, we went from Rucka’s exceptional first run to the several small garbage runs of “One Year Later” (featuring perhaps Diana’s nadir, “Amazons Attack”) to Gail Simone’s stand-out run to JMS’s trainwreck of a run to the awesome Azzarello/Chiang New 52 run to the wreck of the Finch’s run to Rucka’s fulfilling comeback. Diana’s had plenty of great runs, but it’s hard to get any real consistency with the character. Even looking at each “good” run I listed here, they all had completely different supporting casts and goals. I always feel like we’re starting over with Diana instead of building off what came before, and I always worry that the next creative team will destroy anything good the previous team built in ways I don’t worry about that for, say, Batman.

      • I actually kind of liked JMS’ run. It was a perfectly competent story, a basic quest storyline all rooted in Wonder Woman’s ability to love. Perfectly good Wonder Woman (the trainwreck was JMS’ Superman). I think his run suffered the same problem of Superior Spiderman and Secret Empire, where everyone gets up in arms about something that would obviously be resolved by the ending. The only difference here is that Flashpoint and the New 52 loomed so large that people weren’t paying attention to the ending.
        Which is a shame, as there was a lot of decent stuff there. I actually do like the costume redesign, which looked like something someone would actually wear instead of a bathing suit that Diana was always at risk of spilling out of (especially as that leather jacket was set alight and burnt at just the right narrative moment to affirm the fact that Diana was all about love). Not a great run, but I think it is unfairly maligned.

        But yeah, the real problem with Wonder Woman is that there is no consistency. Everyone wants to recreate Wonder Woman, which leaves her shockingly ill defined and a consistently problematic character in what is supposed to be DC’s Trinity. Compare her to the other members of the Trinities, and her lack of definition compared to Superman, Batman, Iron Man, Captain America and Thor is clear. No one ever builds on what came before, and nothing has ever been truly defined

        • “Everyone wants to recreate Wonder Woman, which leaves her shockingly ill defined”

          I think that might be due to the way women have been portrayed in comics the last 70 years (which correlates to women in America the last 70 years). Men haven’t changed all that much (at least not heroic portrayals of them).

          That doesn’t excuse the difference in quality of the stories, but it certainly might explain the variation in tone and explain some of the “recreations”.

        • There are a couple of things. Part of it is how women were written throughout history (there is a reason that so many major female characters, like Captain Marvel and Batgirl etc are finally having their defining runs now. You could probably add characters like Spiderwoman here as well, but time will have to tell with that). Part of it is that you can’t really use Wonder Woman’s initial comics as a foundation in the same way you can with Batgirl. Batgirl’s initial comics are a pretty typical foundation, while the original Wonder Woman is full of Marston’s kinks. There is a lot of reason to discuss why Wonder Woman has evolved past that kinky aspect, that leans on both the discomfort with sexuality comics has long struggled with and the way that the content can easily go in unfortunate directions, but it is a massive hurdle.

          But I think the biggest problem is that Wonder Woman is often supposed to be perfect example of womanhood*, and the fact that every writer has a rapidly different interpretation of that. Which leads people to writing unfortunate stuff like the fact that Diana is supposed to be thought of as the most beautiful woman in the entire world by everyone in certain interpretations, and similar problems. The major, defining feature everyone agrees on is something so personal that it gets interpreted in a million ways. And leading in really bad directions when the person writing it has examined sexist beliefs. Everyone wants to write the perfect woman, and that makes consistency hard.

          I don’t think the problem is the differing levels of quality. Every character goes through eras like that. Batman has bad eras, like War Games. Or the utterly terrible comics being released at the moment. Batman still has consistency. It is the fact that nothing is ever consistent. Not even her supporting cast


          *This idea of Wonder Woman being this perfect example of womanhood and feminism is a big reason I’ve always had a problem with her. Consistency issues aside, the idea of a single character representing what is supposed to be a diverse and varied group strikes me as wrong. Most obviously, she is, by definition, not intersectional. She’s white. But even ignoring that, there are a hundred million ways to be a woman, and just because you aren’t like Wonder Woman doesn’t mean you are doing it wrong. I think such ideas are better explored through groups of women, like Batgirl of Burnside’s Not Birds of Prey. All distinct and different, but all treated as equally legitimate

      • Honestly, I only casually was aware of Wonder Woman comics before the New 52. Obviously I knew she was a legacy character, but she wasn’t a character I was interested in. I only started reading her at a random comic store’s random comic guy’s encouragement, so I can’t disagree with you too much on that. However, the last 5 years have been mostly excellent I believe.

        • I have a very similar relationship to Wonder Woman — heck, I wasn’t reading ANY monthly comics before her New 52 incarnation — but I have to agree that the Finch run did a lot of damage. I read and loved every issue of the Azzarello/Chiang run, but dropped it after the first issue of the Finches took over. You couldn’t have convinced me to buy another issue, and I was a huge fan of the character. Don’t forget that they were on it for almost a year and a half. That’s more than long enough to necessitate a complete change of direction with the next creative team, which is exactly what we got. The problem isn’t that she doesn’t have good runs, it’s that those good runs are followed by bad ones, which usually necessitates a major course-correction, which in turn means throwing out whatever progress was made with the previous good runs.

        • I really don’t think the problem is bad comics. Bad comics are always unfortunate, and always require course correction. But that wouldn’t justify the sheer level of changes that happens each time. Every character requires course correction at times, yet they get to keep consistent supporting casts. The fix for the current Batman books isn’t getting rid of Snyder and Rucka’s great work. We can keep Kate Kane, Stephanie Brown, Cassandra Cain, Harper Row and Duke Thomas. And all of the great character work they have both done. Meanwhile, who Wonder Woman’s supporting cast is and how the most basic elements of their character. No one can even agree who her arch enemy is. Cheetah? Circe? The idea that the existence of bad runs justify this level of ill definition is wrong

          Hell, it also ignores the fact that Finch’s run was a course correction. We may not approve of it, but it was dedicated to justifying the removal of all of Azzarello’s elements and place Wonder Woman back on the ‘right course’. Even the bad runs are course correcting what came before, and changing everything. Which is rooted in the issue that no one can agree who Wonder Woman is.

Leave a Reply to GE Scott Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s