Secret Weapons 1: Discussion

by Patrick Ehlers and Drew Baumgartner

This article contains SPOILERS. If you haven’t read the issue yet, proceed at your own risk!

slim-banner

Patrick: Thwip! Bamf! Snikt! You know those sound effects: respectively, they mean a) Spider-Man shooting some web fluid, b) Nightcrawler teleporting away, and c) Wolverine deploying his claws. It is perhaps illustrative of the predictability of their superpowers that there are immutable sound effects that accompany them. You know exactly what it sounds like when Wolvie pops his claws, but you also know exactly what he can do with them. These powers are used in unsurprising ways to save the day, but what happens when the superheroes have powers that aren’t so easy to understand? Well, then you’ve got the residents of The Willow and the cast of Secret Weapons.

The premise for Secret Weapons is simple: a group of superhero rejects struggle to find their place in a world that doesn’t value their super powers. In the Valiant universe, these characters are called Psiots, but they’re basically Mutants or Inhumans from the Marvel Universe, or Metahumans from the DC Universe. They have latent powers that require some scientific method to unlock them, but are otherwise human. The first of these Psiots that we meet is named Nicole Finch, and her power is Ornipathy, or the ability to speak to birds. Right out the gate, writer Eric Heisserer is playing with some of the more hilarious superhero tropes, right down to giving the hero a name with a groaningly obvious pun. “Finch.” Nicole’s power is also immediately evocative of everyone’s favorite superhero punching-bag, Aquaman, who is oft-derided for his ability to speak to fish. DC’s writers may have tried to back down on the goofiness of that power, taking pains to specify that he commands fish, but Heisserer doesn’t give a fuck: Nicole talks to birds. Like, she literally carries on a conversation with a pigeon.

Check out how dismissive those narration boxes are. It’s never made 100% clear whose dossiers we’re reading here, which lends these observations about her a little more authority. The reader can’t ascribe a specific agenda or perspective to “Does not qualify for Harbinger training,” so we sorta have to take the statement at face value. Nicole’s powers — which, remember, are talking to birds — are not worth our time or interest.

But that’s where the series’ villain, and the creative team, disagree with you. We don’t know much about this power-vampire — the closest thing we get to a name is Rex-0. (Also, to add some additional ambiguity, I’m not sure if that’s Rex-Zero or Rex-Oh… I’m going to use the number from here on.) All we really know is that Rex-0 has been sent out to harvest “champions” to collect their powers from them. Our omniscient narrator may have passed on Nicole, but our boy Rex sees the value. We actually start the issue with Rex-0 and his evil scientist overlord, which sets up this idea that Rex is going to be targeting “fallen champions” to “get closer to […] gods.”

Okay, so which is it? Are Nicole’s powers worth of ridicule or worthy of envy? Brother, you best believe it’s the latter. Nicole overwhelms her opponents with flows of birds, she uses the updraft provided by their flight patterns to aid her jumps, she sleeps under the watchful eye of a pigeon coop. The artist team of Raúl Allén and Patricia Martín relishes every panel of her bird-summoning acrobatics.

Allén and Martín slow time in that second row of panels while flipping back at forth between perspectives, simultaneously slowing down and speeding up the action. The result is that Nicole, who is homeless and who’s powers are laughable, is a badass, commanding the page in blockbuster fashion.

I’d argue that Heisserer, Allén and Martín extend this reverence to everyone’s superpowers. Even Valiant mainstays like Livewire have unique and innovative expressions of their abilities. There’s a sequence where she leads Owen Cho — an inconvenient-object-summoner — through the streets of Oklahoma City by selectively activating streetlights and traffic signals. These characters are finding non-obvious solutions to their problems, and we can see that same spirit of intention applied to Allén and Martín and how they solve storytelling problems.

Finch and Cho spend a night together in a pigeon coop. This isn’t a romantic evening, or anything like that, but the characters do share a moment of intimacy. Allén and Martín give us the night and the morning at the same time.

This is my favorite page in the issue. If we’re reading from left to right, every single one of these horizontal panels starts with night and ends with day, but if we’re reading straight down, it’s a singular march toward the morning. Finch and Cho don’t say much to each other, and Martín’s tight speech balloons makes their dialogue look even smaller, but the simple turn toward each other by the page’s end speaks volumes about their relationship. They have a shared history that has put them into another harrowing experience that they will survive together.

Drew, I loved this issue. It seems like there’s a fair amount of Valiant mythology floating around on the periphery (i.e., who is Harada?), but not enough to get in the way of a n00b like me enjoying it. Heisserer’s script is tight as a drum and it’s hard to fathom the sheer number of panels Allén and Martín cram on to every page. I’m so excited to hear what you have to say about this issue that I don’t even want to prompt you with anything specific. Okay, here’s a fun one: how do you think Martin’s power of “makes inanimate objects glow” could possibly pay off?

slim-banner

Drew: It’s definitely difficult to imagine a scenario where that particular skill might come in handy — it seems a bit like Gambit, but without any actual offensive utility — but one of the benefits of Allén and Martín’s documentarian style is that we pick up the rules of his powers without any actual explanation.

Phosphene

It seems he has to be holding the inanimate object in question, and that the glowing stops the second he’s no longer in contact with it. That’s a decidedly limited power. He wouldn’t be able to light your path the way Livewire did in this issue, for example, so it’s difficult to imagine practical applications. Of course, we also don’t know if these are hard limits on his ability — perhaps with training, he can make larger objects glow (a wall? a room? a building?), or glow intensely enough to blind or disorient enemies. The power may seem silly and useless now, but as the Pete Holmes Show made clear, so does basically every X-Man’s power when you really think about it.

I mean, talking to birds is objectively silly, but it doesn’t stop Nicole from being a certified badass in this issue. Ultimately, her most heroic qualities — bravery, loyalty, and sense of duty — have nothing to do with superpowers, but she’s managed to find use for her powers that actually helps achieve her goals. Still, it seems she’s mostly relying on training up her regular human abilities — she mentions “sneaking into the gym” as part of her normal routine — which gives her a decidedly Batman-like feel. Heck, replace her ability to talk to birds with some kind of bird-attracting tech, and her rescue of Martin is remarkably evokative of Batman: Year One.

As much fun as Allén and Martín’s dense paneling is, my favorite moments are when they cram multiple actions into a single panel, most often to capture Nicole’s balletics.

Nicole Finch Leaps

This approach feels almost essential to demonstrating just how skilled Nicole is. We can see exactly how far she leaps with nary a bird in sight — that’s all muscle and training that carries her onto the roof. Again, ornipathy or no, Nicole is a fucking superhero.

Which may hint at some interesting gender stuff bubbling beneath the surface of the series. Obviously, introducing two badass female superheroes while the two superpowered males are more or less useless in a fight is a subversion of sorts, but I think there may be an interesting story on the gender politics that carried the characters to that point. Harada (who I’m pretty sure is the asshole we see in that holographic message, Patrick) told these psiots they were useless, which Nicole took to heart less than the men because she’d heard it all before. As a woman, she was used to defying society’s low expectations of her, so wasn’t going to live down to Harada’s dismissal. Martin and Owen, on the other hand, accepted Harada’s assessment, seeing their powers as useless at best, and a huge inconvenience at worst. Nicole’s gender conferred upon her what Malcolm Gladwell calls “advantageous disadvantages,” setting her up for success that her male counterparts couldn’t imagine.

So yeah, this is a dense issue, full of Valiant mythology and new character introductions, but it flows beautifully, buoyed by clever storytelling decisions by the entire creative team. Character voices rang clear as day, and the action managed to be just as revelatory. This is an exceptional first issue, one that manages not only to excite me about what comes next, but also to inspire curiosity about the universe surrounding it. I’m hooked.

slim-banner

For a complete list of what we’re reading, head on over to our Pull List page. Whenever possible, buy your comics from your local mom and pop comic bookstore. If you want to rock digital copies, head on over to Comixology and download issues there. There’s no need to pirate, right?

Advertisements

9 comments on “Secret Weapons 1: Discussion

  1. I didn’t have this quite developed enough to mention it in the piece, but I think the gender stuff might be even more complicated: How do we feel about Owen’s unexpected, often inconvenient, and occasionally embarrassing conjuring as a metaphor for menses? Obviously, women being cast out of society because of their periods isn’t exactly the problem it used to be, but there’s still a definite stigma around talking about it. I might have gone way off the deep end with this one, but I think there’s something there.

    • And/or pregnancy. Owen loses a job because he could manifest something wildly inconvenient at any time.

      Ultimately, I don’t totally read it as gendered as you do. I think inconvenient conjuring of dangerous or unstable objects could just as easily be a racial or economic metaphor. His power is a liability that he can’t control and people don’t want to deal with said liability.

      • I absolutely agree that there may be more potent parallels to draw in today’s climate, but I was struck by the gendering of the power elsewhere in this issue.

      • Or maybe it’s a boner metaphor! In this issue, he only conjures phallic objects (a shotgun and an umbrella) that he’s embarrassed by.

  2. Other stuff we didn’t mention: I absolutely adore Martín’s (or maybe it’s Allén’s) sfx lettering. I see a lot of people deriding sound effects, but this is done so seamlessly, I doubt anyone could really fault it. You can see a bit of it in the scene with the pigeons Patrick posted at the top, but I was particularly enamored of the “KLASSH” when the monster crashes through the skylight during the big fight. It’s just good lettering.

    • A chunk of that KLASSH panel appears before the cold open – we can just see Rex and the letters on either side of him. I was staring at it for a LONG TIME trying to figure out why there was an A and an S around this guy. Eventually I remembered it was a pull from the issue itself, but I was trying to work that out for a solid minute.

      I really like that Martín is credited with the letters AND the art. Makes me think that that team is more clued in making one work within the context of the other. Her speech balloons are all very tight, leaving almost no un-utilized white space within the panels.

  3. This is a phenomenal discussion. Going to link to it for friends. Thanks for the deep dive on the first issue, guys. I’m eager for you to see issue 2. (And yes, the hologram man is Toyo Harada.)

  4. Wow, this looks really good. Valiant has never interested me, but this really does. Great premise, great art and the guy who wrote the screenplay for one of the best movies of last year? I am in

What you got?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s