Politics and Puddin’ in Batman: White Knight 2

by Michael DeLaney 

This article contains SPOILERS. If you haven’t read the issue yet, proceed at your own risk!

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from Batman: White Knight, but I can now safely say that it is indeed worth the hype. White Knight is part Elseworlds, part political commentary, and part meta commentary on a particularly shameful retcon of recent DC continuity.

Sean Murphy isn’t subtle about where he draws his Batman inspiration from. The reformed Joker reclaims the Jack Napier moniker from Tim Burton’s Batman. And the canon and visuals from Batman: The Animated Series are undeniable.

I think my favorite example of his reverence for that groundbreaking series comes in the form of a meta-showdown between classic Harley Quinn and the scantily-clad version from The New 52 and the Suicide Squad movie. By making nu-Harley a loathsome sprit of spite and classic Harley’s “feminism” jab, Murphy speaks for all of us fans of the original Paul Dini creation.

Murphy’s Jack/Joker dynamic is an interesting twist on The Clown Prince of Crime — one that’s probably necessary if we’re supposed to be semi-rooting for him to take Batman down. There’s also something to be said about this in relation to Harley herself. The Harley/Joker relationship has always been a study in abusive relationships. But here Murphy is literally splitting their respective personalities into two separate people; excising their negative, hateful qualities.

A frequent criticism of Batman is that he hurts more people than he helps — both on the civilian and villain side of things. Murphy takes that a step further and shows how the 1% could game the system and abuse local government policies to line their pockets.

Check out this book you guys.

The conversation doesn’t stop there. What do you wanna talk about from this issue?

One comment on “Politics and Puddin’ in Batman: White Knight 2

  1. The pages I saw seemed to completely erase the abusive relationship between them, or at least severely downplay it. The pages I saw just showed Joker as neglectful, not abusive. Which is horrid.

    The Jokes has always been abusive, even as part of the animated series. There relationship has always been abusive, whether physically or emotionally. I just searched Joker Harley into Youtube, saw the first Batman TAS video and saw a compilation of scenes where maybe only one or two of them wasn’t abusive
    You can’t ignore the abuse, can’t just pretend it isn’t a major part of the Joker/Harley relationship. This book seems to be as cowardly as I feared. Too busy trying to ‘rehabilitate’ the Joker that it tries to erase and downplay all the parts that would hurt the fantasy. I saw Murphy say that he sees Joker/Harley as one of DC’s Power Couples, which is a disturbing way of looking at things.

    But this seems to have all the disgustingness I feared. Pretending to be meaningful while actually just whitewashing the Joker so that people can pretend the nihilistic murderer in the mainline comics can said to just be ‘telling it like it is’. I can see this book having a really bad effect on the already toxic Joker fanboy set

What you got?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s