Laying the Evidence in Batgirl 12

by Drew Baumgartner

Batgirl 12

This article contains SPOILERS. If you haven’t read the issue yet, proceed at your own risk!

There are no incidental details in prose. Or rather, there are no specific incidental details in prose. You might get a sketchy description of someone’s home or office, with the understanding that you can more or less fill in the blanks on what kind of furniture might be there, but if a specific item of furniture matters, it has to be mentioned explicitly. This makes it very difficult to introduce elements casually; if a specific item of furniture is mentioned, we can’t help but assume it will have some significance to the story. For most stories, that’s not a problem — indeed, faith that the details matter to the narrative might be fundamental to our enjoyment of them — but that gets complicated when there’s a mystery to be solved. That is, prose has a hard time giving us clues that don’t immediately broadcast themselves as clues; the very fact that it’s being mentioned betrays its significance.

Visual media, on the other hand, is full of details we often ignore or dismiss as incidental. That is, we can see the specific items of furniture in a room without ascribing any more significance to them than “set dressing,” meaning we can actually be surprised at their significance later. This is a devilish way to introduce clues in a mystery, forcing the reader to identify what is and isn’t significant. Hope Larson has always embraced this feature on Batgirl, allowing Babs to recall elements from earlier panels we might have missed (which in turn drives home how valuable her eidetic memory is to her sleuthing), but issue 12 brings an almost defiant confidence to understating plot points. Here it is in action:

Batgirl finds clues

Did you catch it? While the characters are offering the kinds of exposition so many Sherlock Holmes stories have led us to believe contain all of the clues, the most important plot point might actually be Babs glancing at that missing person poster on the bulletin board. Beyond simply placing that poster in the background of the scene, artist Eleonora Carlini has taken pains to make it look like an insignificant detail, shoving it so far to the side of the panel, we can’t even see the whole thing. It’s only when Babs flashes back to this moment (from a slightly different angle) that we have any indication that there might even be a missing person at the heart of this mystery. It’s a way for Larson and Carlini not only to keep us on our toes, but to remind us just how good Babs is at finding clues.

The conversation doesn’t stop there. What do you wanna talk about from this issue?

Advertisements

2 comments on “Laying the Evidence in Batgirl 12

  1. I enjoyed this issue, but despite the generally good detective work throughout most of the issue, I thought there was one really broad deductive leap Barbara made: connecting Liana’s disappearance to the pool apparition. Babs was only investigating Radden because Qadir mentioned he would be able to help analyze her data from the pool. Even when she discovered Liana’s mysterious disappearance and how it was connected to Radden, that would seem to most people to be an entirely separate case; after all, there’s nothing really connecting the two cases other than the poster at the pool and the fact that Babs is working both cases. The schematic of the teleportation machine, I suppose, is enough for Babs to make such a leap as at least a guess, but it a bit frustrating that the only thing leading her to that conclusion and those clues in the first place is the fact that Qadir just so happened to mention Radden as someone smart enough to help with the case, who just so happened to end up being the perpetrator. It would have felt more satisfying if there was some sort of clue at the pool leading Barbara to Radden. There’s enough clues to prove Radden’s guilt, but I feel like the clues that lead Barbara to Radden in the first place is more narrative convenience than anything else.

    • There’s no doubt that the mystery/solution is super compressed here. Heck, we never actually meet Radden, so Barbara’s suspicion is entirely based on circumstance and creepy vibes she got from an email (which she received months ago). This is a story that probably would have been better served as a two-parter, giving the investigation more space to breathe, and giving Babs the opportunity to really discover the connection between these cases. That said, I’m kind of willing to forgive the problems you mention just to have a “case of the month” detective series on the shelves right now — this is all I’ve wanted from the bat-family books for years now, so I’m happy, even if this one scuffs the execution a bit.

What you got?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s