Batgirl 30

batgirl 30Today, Patrick and Spencer are discussing Batgirl 30, originally released April 9th, 2014. 

slim-bannerPatrick: One of the tricks to performing satisfying long form improv is the ability to call out an unusual thing and deal with it. In fact, most of the Upright Citizens Brigade’s comedic philosophy is based around that single truth: whatever’s happening, let’s identify it, explore it and process it. “Don’t be coy” is what that usually breaks down to. Issue 30 of Batgirl is mercilessly coy, refusing to share its biggest secret, but still tries desperately to mine pathos out of it. The result is an emotional clusterfuck — one that I doubt would be satisfying even if the powers that be deemed us worthy of Forever Evils biggest reveals.

Elephant in the room: SOMETHING HAPPENED TO NIGHTWING. Between Forever Evil 6 and the fact that Nightwing is ending its run with a issue 30 (not written by series writer Kyle Higgins), we can jump to one pretty logical conclusion: Dick Grayson is dead. Or… right? Babs’ running voice over will not stop bringing up Dick as someone who is gone, taking special care to talk about him in the past tense — and even correcting herself when she accidentally uses the present tense. As far as Barbara knows, Dick Grayson is gone.

I wanna stop right there for a second because there are so many problems piling up — and I haven’t even begun my recap yet — that we just need to address some of the problems with this kind of storytelling. The first problem is one of timing. This is a reactionary issue, something that can be immensely satisfying when the character and the reader are allowed to share an emotional state of mind. Jeff Lemire’s Animal Man mined the reader’s affection to Cliff (and, more generally, the Baker family) in the fallout of Rot World. Naturally, we mourn the loss after the character dies. That’s how emotions work: it’s “stimulus” followed by “response,” not just a “response” hanging out there by itself. I know, I argued a few months ago that reading the Green Lantern Corps epilogue to Wrath of the First Lantern before the actually finale was released actually felt like an interesting commentary on the inevitability of Green Lantern comics, but Batgirl is too emotionally honest to engage in that kind of detached commentary.

But that’s an isolated incident right? Geoff Johns and David Finch aren’t going to casually delay emotional stimulus on the reg. The deeper problem, and one I don’t see changing any time soon, is the inseparable connection between series such that what happens in one requires an emotional reaction in another. Again, this is something we encountered about a year ago when Damian died. That issue of Batgirl (interestingly, also not written by Gail Simone) shoehorned in the loss of a character that had never appeared in the series. The actual story of Barbara Gordon loving Damian, losing Damian and mourning his death is told in the spaces between series. The same is true here, unless I’ve forgotten a cameo, Dick doesn’t appear in this series at all (though Babs does appear in an issue of Nightwing). There is something appealing about the interactive nature of kind of storytelling — you get more out by putting more in. Thing is: I don’t want to have to read the entirety of DC’s line in order to emotionally “get” what’s happening in any given issue.

Sorry for the rant, y’all. It’s such a miniscule part of the issue, I debated even bring it up (other than to say “oops”). Honestly, none of Barbara’s actions are affected by her grief. None. Barbara picks up a demon-readin’ on her EMF, and investigates a slumber party that has successfully summoned a horror from beyond. The creature, called the Midnight Man, mimics its victims, but not in any convincing or relevant way. Batgirl is able to repel the beast with a mix of sage and fire (y’know, like the Simon & Garfunkle song).

Maybe if there was more to hang on to here, I wouldn’t have my litany of complaints about the timing of the issue, but not even the internal emotional moments track. When she delivers the final blow to the Midnight Man, Batgirl shouts “You wanna know my name? I’m Batgirl!” even though her own identity was never put into question.

Batgirl say my nameHahaha, what? Who cares?

There’s also a super clumsy comparison between this issue an a horror movie, with Barbara questioning her ability to take down the monster. Frustratingly, none of the storytelling takes any of its cues from the horror genre: not the pacing, not the atmosphere, not the art. The closest the issue comes to emulating horror is with the teen characters that summon Midnight Man, but even they lack the characteristics that would make them register as slasher movie archetypes (the nerd, the jock, the funny one, the slut, virgin… look, we’ve all seen Scream, this shit should be easy).

BLORG! Spencer, I don’t think this issue satisfied me on any level… other than, of course, fueling my righteous rage. I guess it’s sorta interesting that there are more supernatural baddies running around Gotham, but if we really are in the aftermath of Forever Evil, I’d guess the city’s got bigger problems. I don’t know buddy, did you find something more to like in this than I did?

slim-bannerSpencer: Oof, I didn’t even think about how this issue has to take place after Forever Evil; how does that even work? How has Gotham been rebuilt that fast? How is nobody scarred? Ugh.

There actually is one thing I’ve been thinking a lot about in regards to this issue, Patrick, but it has very little to do with the actual content of the issue itself. I don’t really have all that much to talk about, though, so here we go: the idea of “doors” has a lot of relevance to Barbara Gordon. The worst moment of Barbara’s life is the moment a madman came through her front door and shot her in the spine. Meanwhile, what’s the Midnight Man if not a monster that comes in through the front door? The comparisons are too similar to be a complete coincidence, yet writer Marguerite Bennett does nothing with the idea; at the least she could have shown some anger from Barbara towards the kids for straight-up inviting their monster through their door.

Not that Bennett would be under any obligation to use that idea, but it certainly strikes me as more interesting than anything else in this issue. The thing is, while this issue certainly has its fair share of problems and weaknesses, a lack of ideas isn’t one of them. If anything, there’s too much going on here, so much so that none of Bennett’s ideas get a chance to stick. First there’s the frustratingly vague, ill-timed Nightwing stuff. Patrick, you said that none of Barbara’s actions are driven by her grief, but I believe that they are certainly intended to be, as Nightwing and his views and strategies are the driving force behind Babs’ internal monologue, but none of that comes across in her actual actions, which are as clever and decisive as always. The “horror movie trope” stuff is just as bad, fizzling out almost as soon as it starts, mentioned too few times to ever gain any traction.

Perhaps my least favorite idea is Barbara’s constant comparisons between herself and the Robins, her constant musings about how different their paths are. Not only is the repetition of the theme annoying, but so is the ridiculously purple prose; worst of all, though, is that Bennett is just as coy with this concept as she is with Nightwing’s fate. For as much as Batgirl harps about her path being different from a Robin’s, she does nothing to expound upon what actually makes those paths differ. Even worse, Babs spends so much time reminiscing about her training with Batman and late-night movie marathons with the Robins that there really seems to be no difference between them; as far as this narrative is concerned, Batgirl’s doing everything the Robins do, so how are they different?

Even the monster is uninspired. For whatever supernatural horror the Midnight Man instills, it’s basically just Clayface mixed with a little bit of Tar Pit and Inque. It can’t even shapeshift as well as Clayface! Speaking of which, I know Patrick already laughed at it, but I’ll reiterate: the idea of the Midnight Man copying identities is so tacked-on and inconsequential that it’s laughable. Robert Gill’s art isn’t much better; at its best it’s basically a pretty decent approximation of the typical DC/Batgirl house style, but considering I haven’t been all that impressed by said house style lately, that’s not saying much.

Ultimately, Bennett even leaves any explanations as to why the Midnight Man suddenly came to life as a mystery. That wouldn’t bother me if the plot or characters or art was good enough to distract me from the inconsistencies, but that’s woefully not the case; all the major elements of this issue fail. I hate writing negative reviews. I want to like Bennett’s work; I want every comic I read to be the best comic I’ve ever read, but I’m just having a hard time finding much of anything good to say about this comic. The Midnight Man should have stayed behind closed doors.

slim-bannerFor a complete list of what we’re reading, head on over to our Pull List page. Whenever possible, buy your comics from your local mom and pop comic bookstore. If you want to rock digital copies, head on over to DC’s website and download issues there. There’s no need to pirate, right?

10 comments on “Batgirl 30

  1. There is sort of a “Batgirl house style” right now isn’t there? Is everyone just aping Fernando Pasarin’s weird facial proportions? There were a couple panels in here where it looked like Babs’ head was a tall cylinder with a face painted on it, like she’s a Simpsons character or something.

    The first year or so of this title actually looked pretty good with Ardian Syaf on pencils, but since then it’s mostly been a personality-less void, visually speaking. I find the same to be true in Nightwing (with the exception of issue 29, which is beautiful and full of personality). Why can’t the Bat-family titles take a chance and look like something? Other than, of course Batwoman….

    And I guess I’ve just answered my own question: Batwoman does (or did) look different, and the DC brass forced the creatives off that book. I don’t know, that part that’s most perplexing to me is that ‘Batman’ seems to be at the heart of all of these books, and Greg Capullo is a very specific talent – he always looks Greg Capullo. So why would fans of ‘Batman’ want to read titles featuring the supporting characters but WITHOUT any sense of personality?

  2. Patrick, I think you have forgotten a Dick cameo: Batgirl 3 featured a prominent fight/flirt match between them, which has largely defined their relationship in the New 52 for me (more even than her cameos in Nightwing). It’s easy to forget — that issue seems like a world away, both in terms of time AND my emotional investment in this title — but it’s a really good issue. It may very well be the high water mark for this series.

    • I sure had forgotten about that issue. In my mind, those first four are so squarely focused on Mirror, but you’re right. I reread Batgirl 3 this morning, and they leave on pretty rough terms, one of those emotional threads not actually resolved in the pages of Batgirl (or… anywhere?).

  3. News coming out of DC today is that Dick’s not dead, but he is pretending to be dead, so he can work for Batman Incorporated as some kind of spy. Oh, but he’s keeping the name Grayson. All of my original complaints hold.

  4. Not that this issue is great or even maybe good, but I feel like you’re unnecessarily downing the writer for the publisher’s miscalculation; Forever Evil 7 WAS supposed to be out by now, except that it was delayed. The delay wasn’t announced until this issue had already been produced. And, in a moment of serendipity, it still doesn’t even spoil anything we didn’t already know from FE6 or the cancellation of Nightwing. And I have to wholeheartedly disagree that building a meta-narrative between multiple titles, minis, one-shots’ and annuals is a BAD thing. To me it’s the defining aspect of shared-universe comics.

    • Yeah, I sorta backpedal on the criticism of the meta-narrative, but only because the potential rewards of it are so great. I do totally love the idea that the more you’re willing to put into reading comics, the more you’ll get out of it. Read all the New 52, and you will undoubtedly have a fuller picture of what everyone is going through: a kind of uber narrative, on a scale you can’t get anywhere else. When it gets fucked up is in something like this, which you speculate hinges on editorial and administrative reasons. I agree with that 100%, but editors and administrators be crazy, so this kind of thing is just built in to the meta-narrative’s DNA. I think we agree that it’s a for better / for worse situation, and this was just one of those “for worse” situations.

  5. For the record, I blame everything about this issue on the editor. First, if they’d better coordinated their Forever Evil endgame then we’d actually have Gail Simone following a still-fresh Forever Evil conclusion with emotional and atmospheric fallout. And she’d just kill it. She’s on record saying she really enjoyed crossover events as a reader and likes to contribute to them now as a writer. And she’s been THE voice of Batgirl in the New 52 so shoehorning in an unfamiliar writer who is trying to get her sea legs with the book at a critical stage is just disappointing. It also kind of feels like this was a “cushion” issue they had her cook up because maybe they needed to pre-empt a Simone issue for some undisclosed reason and that the Nightwing stuff was crammed into narrative boxes after the fact. Honestly, though, for all the bitching, I enjoyed this well enough. Not mind blowing, and I’d prefer Simone of course, but I have fun peeking behind the editorial curtain and these little snafus kinda make me feel like a smart mark for comics, which I love.

    • It’s definitely strange that the story did seem to keep pace with something that Simone was establishing – i.e., the emergence of supernatural phenomenon in Gotham. Poor Bennett probably had a hell of a time trying to please multiple masters on this one, towing the party line with one hand and feeding Simone’s mythology with the other. Again, it’s the same tripping point Ray Fawkes had on his two issues, there was a little bit of the Gordon family drama, a little acknowledgement of Damian’s passing, and finally Fawkes threw in a one-off villain (just for funsies).

What you got?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s